Weddings in the Pacific
Apostille Convention
The International Convention abolishing the requirement of legalisation for foreign public documents (The Hague, 5 October 1961, Netherlands Treaty Series 1963, 28) (frequently referred to in Dutch as the Apostilleverdrag) was drawn up by the Hague Conference for Private International Law during its ninth session in 1960. weddin26.jpg (29557 bytes)
Content of this document
  1. Introductory remarks
  2. The apostille
  3. What is a public document?
  4. Which authority issues an apostille?
  5. Where does the Convention apply?
  6. Which countries are signatories to the Convention?
  7. Other legalisation conventions

Editor: Willem van Arnhem, former head of the Private International Law Section, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

1 Introductory remarks

According to the explanatory memorandum to the Kingdom Act of 10 March 1965, its aim was, in the context of international legal affairs between the countries signatory to the Convention, to abolish the legalisation, as required by various countries, of the public documents to which the Convention refers, and to replace it with a simple formality.

Under article 2 of the Convention, the contracting States are required to exempt from legalisation public documents which have to be produced in their territory. For the purposes of the Convention, legalisation means only the formality by which diplomatic or consular agents certify the authenticity of the signature on the document. This limited definition of the term legalisation has more far-reaching implications than one might think at first sight.

In the normal course of affairs, only signatures known to the consulate will be legalised. Generally speaking, the signatures are those of competent officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the country of origin. It is usually necessary for a document to be legalised by a number of bodies, resulting in a series (either long or short) of signatures, so that the consul can legalise a signature he is familiar with. With the abolition of legalisation by the consular agent, the series of previous legalisations is no longer necessary either.

The simple formality which has replaced legalisation is the addition of a certificate, or 'apostille'.

Many local authorities believe that documents originating from countries which are signatories to the Convention do not require legalisation. This is incorrect. Such documents need not undergo the lengthy legalisation process but they must always have an apostille appended.

2 The apostille
The apostille referred to in article 3 of the Convention is placed on the document itself or on what is known as the 'allonge' (annexed to the document for this purpose). It is in the form of a square whose sides are at least 9 cm long and the title ("Apostille (Convention de La Haye du 5 octobre 1961)") must be in French. The rest of the information may be in the official language of the issuing authority.

Specimen apostille

APOSTILLE

(Convention de La Haye du 5 octobre 1961)

1. Country: …………………………………………………………………………….

This public document

2. is signed by ………………………………………………………………

3. acting in the capacity of ………………………………………………

4. bears the stamp/seal of …………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………………..

Certified

5. at …………………………….. 6. on ……………………………………………

7. by ………………………………………………………………………………

…………………………………………………………………………………….

8. No. ………………………………………………………………………….

9. Stamp/seal ………………………….. .………………….10. Signature:

…………………………. …………………………………………………….

If the Convention does apply to a document, it is important to check whether the apostille has been appended. If properly completed, the apostille confirms the authenticity of the signature, the capacity in which the signatory has acted and, where necessary, the identity of the stamp or seal on the document. If there are doubts about the origin of a document, an interested party may contact the authority responsible for appending the apostille.

3 What is a public document?
What needs to be borne in mind when accepting a document from a country which is a signatory to the Convention? First of all, whether it is indeed a public document within the meaning of the Convention. There is no general definition of this term in the Convention, but since the contracting States wished to facilitate the abolition of legalisation, the term must be given as broad an interpretation as possible.

In view of this, all documents which are not private instruments are deemed to be public documents. The Convention specifies the following:

  • documents emanating from an authority or an official connected with the courts or tribunals of the State, including those emanating from a public prosecutor, a clerk of a court or a process server:

Since the Convention refers to 'the courts or tribunals of the State', this must be taken to include all judicial decisions given in a contracting State, thus not only the judgments of the courts, but also those given by other, special tribunals and even ecclesiastical courts if they are acting as tribunals of the State.

  • administrative documents;

These include all documents issued by the administrative authorities in a contracting State. The explanatory memorandum referred to above gives diplomas and degree certificates as examples. Certificates of birth/death/marriage and extracts from the population register also fall into this category.

  • notarial acts;

All instruments drawn up by a notary fall into this category.

  • official certificates which are placed on documents signed by persons in their private capacity, such as official certificates recording the registration of a document or the fact that it was in existence on a certain date and authentications of signatures;

The explanatory memorandum assumes that the legalisation of a private instrument by a notary is deemed to be an official certificate, so that the document in question is covered by the Convention and may have an apostille appended.

The Convention does not apply to:

  • documents drawn up by consular and diplomatic agents. For example, a declaration drawn up by the Japanese Embassy in The Hague to the effect that a person is unmarried does not require an apostille.
  • administrative documents relating directly to commercial transactions or Customs formalities.

4 Which authority issues an apostille?

An apostille is issued by a designated central authority. In the Netherlands this is the registrar at the district court. In other countries it is often the Minister of Justice or of Foreign Affairs.

An overview of all the designated authorities in the various countries is to be found at the website of the Hague Conference on International Private Law: (www.hcch.net), under ‘Conventions’, then No. 12 ‘Convention of 5 October 1961 abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents’.

If there are doubts about the origin of a document, an interested party may contact the authority responsible for appending the apostille. Article 7 of the Convention obliges the competent authorities to keep a register or card index in which the apostilles issued are recorded. Such as system must specify:

  • the number and date of the apostille;
  • the name of the person signing the public document and the capacity in which he has acted;
  • if the document is unsigned, the name of the authority which has affixed the seal or stamp.

5 Where does the Convention apply?

The Convention applies to the whole of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, i.e. to the Netherlands in Europe and to the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba. However, it would be wrong to think that documents originating from the Netherlands Antilles or Aruba which have to be produced in the Netherlands must have an apostille appended. There is no legalisation requirement in operation between the different parts of the Kingdom.

6 Which countries are signatories to the Convention?

The list below has been updated to 3 October 2001.

The date given after a country’s name is the date on which the Convention entered into force in that country.

Andorra

31.12.96

Germany

13.02.66

Norway

29.07.83

Antigua & Barbuda

01.11.81

Greece

18.05.85

Panama

04.08.91

Argentina

18.02.88

Hungary

18.01.73

Portugal

04.02.69

Armenia

14.08.94

Hong Kong

24.01.65

Romania

16.03.01

Aruba

30.04.67

Ireland

09.03.99

Russian Federation

31.05.92

Australia

16.03.95

Israel

14.08.78

St. Kitts & Nevis

14.12.94

Austria

13.01.68

Italy

11.02.78

Samoa

13.09.99

Bahamas

10.07.73

Japan

27.07.70

San Marino

13.02.95

Barbados

30.11.66

Kazakhstan

30.01.01

Seychelles

31.03.79

Belorussia

(White Russia)

31.05.92

Latvia

30.01.96

Slovenia

08.10.91

Belgium

09.02.76

Lesotho

04.10.66

South Africa

30.04.95

Belize

11.04.93

Liberia

08.02.96

Spain

25.09.78

Bosnia-Herz.

06.03.92

Liechtenstein

19.07.72

Surinam

25.11.75

Botswana

30.09.66

Lithuania

19.07.97

Swaziland

06.09.68

Brunei Darus.

03.12.87

Luxembourg

03.06.79

Sweden

01.05.99

Bulgaria

29.04.01

Macedonia

17.09.91

Switzerland

11.03.73

Colombia

30.01.01

Malawi

01.12.67

Tonga

04.06.70

Croatia

08.10.91

Malta

02.03.68

Trinidad & Tobago

14.07.00

Cyprus

30.04.73

Marshall Isl.

14.08.92

Turkey

29.09.85

Czech Rep.

16.03.99

Mauritius

12.03.68

United Kingdom

24.01.65

El Salvador

31.05.96

Mexico

14.08.95

United States

15.10.81

Estonia

30.09.01

Namibia

30.01.01

Venezuela

16.03.99

Fiji

10.10.70

Netherlands

08.10.65

Yugoslavia (Fed. Rep.)

11.04.92

Finland

26.08.85

Netherlands Antilles

30.04.67

   

France

24.01.65

Niue

02.03.99

   
7 Other legalisation conventions
There are of course other conventions which completely abolish the legalisation requirement. If a document originates from a country that is a signatory to one of these conventions, the Dutch authorities may not insist on legalisation.

In some countries more than one convention is applicable, so that it is possible for certain documents from a particular country to be exempt from legalisation whereas others require an apostille.

See also: